Younger Thug Battles Authorities Over Rights To His Seized Property

The State of Georgia desires Younger Thug to forfeit property seized throughout his arrest in Might.


Based on court docket paperwork obtained by AllHipHop, a grievance for forfeiture was filed over objects seized from Younger Thug and Lil Duke. The 2 have been among the many 28 individuals indicted in a sweeping RICO case in opposition to YSL members.

Authorities seized $149,426.00 in U.S. foreign money. Officers snatched firearms and several other autos, together with a Corvette and a Porsche.

Cops took 87 items of jewellery. The equipment included an 18k Gold Patek Philippe and a Rolex with “King Slime” engraved on the again, amongst different watches.

A number of pendants, bracelets, necklaces, rings and earrings have been seized. Lots of the objects had customized engravings, equivalent to “YSL X BC 4 LIFE.” Cops additionally grabbed clothes from Younger Thug, whose actual title is Jeffery Williams.

“Officers positioned and seized from contained in the kitchen of Mr. Williams’ 355 Allison Drive residence a inexperienced hooded sweatshirt on which there was printed the phrase ‘SLIME OVER S#### Make America Slime Once more,’” the court docket paperwork disclosed.

Rafaello & Firm claimed to personal among the jewellery seized by cops. The proprietor stated 9 items have been loaned to Younger Thug.

Younger Thug denied Rafaello & Firm had any “lawful curiosity” within the seized property. Officers may solely determine 4 objects that probably belonged to the jeweler.

“Of the 9 jewellery items which Rafaello & Firm Inc. asserts to personal and to have lent to Mr. Williams, solely 4 items resemble any of the items of jewellery seized on Might 9, 2022,” authorities declared. “The opposite 5 items of jewellery don’t resemble any of the items of jewellery seized on Might 9, 2022.”

Younger Thug’s lawyer Brian Metal responded to the grievance for forfeiture by contending the property was unlawfully seized.

“Forfeiture of the seized property is barred by the prohibition in opposition to extreme fines set forth within the Eighth Modification to america Structure,” Metal argued.

The legal professional added, “[Young Thug] is the lawful proprietor of the seized property. Claimant obtained the seized property by reputable transactions whereby the property was both bought in lawful arms size transactions and the cash used to buy stated seized property was lawfully earned by reputable employment; or the objects have been gifted to Claimant by individuals who’ve untainted funds.”

Metal requested for the grievance for forfeiture to be dismissed. He requested a financial award to cowl legal professional’s charges and bills.














Leave a Comment