The ‘harmful’ downside that F1 drivers wish to say goodbye to

Alexander Wurz, Chairman of the Grand Prix Drivers’ Affiliation, has known as for F1 to get rid of sausage kerbs, which he and the drivers consider to be a “harmful” characteristic.

The GPDA permits drivers to share their opinions (anonymously) on a variety of points inside the sport, and security is at all times a key matter.

In an unique interview with RacingNews365.com, Wurz shared his reward for the present state of Components 1 when it comes to security measures. Nonetheless, he acknowleged {that a} main concern is that of sausage kerbs.

“On the finish of the day, the game is in an especially wholesome place,” Wurz defined.

“Issues which we had 5 to 10 years in the past. which was that the game itself is just not maximising its potential, that’s positively answered and the course is excellent.

“Now we have now to only guarantee that, on this part of [the sport] getting common, everybody retains two toes on the bottom and realises that we nonetheless share the identical paddock, we sit in the identical boat, we have now the identical curiosity.”

Wurz requires change to “harmful” sausage kerbs

Wurz believes that there’s nonetheless progress that may be made when it comes to security.

“From the security perspective, primary can be elimination of the sausage kerbs,” the previous F1 driver mentioned.

Wurz added that kerbs are usually not primarily unsuitable, however {that a} sausage kerb shouldn’t be used to “make a boring chicane attention-grabbing”.

“I’d possibly hope, with studying in regards to the sausage kerbs being harmful, we will return to particular person kerbs [designed] monitor by monitor,” he continued.

Sausage kerbs have been part of crashes prior to now, together with an enormous incident for Alex Peroni at 2019’s Components 3 race at Monza, the place his automobile was launched into the air after hitting a sausage kerb earlier than touchdown the wrong way up on the tyre wall.

As such, the GPDA hopes to see incidents like this disappear from motorsport as quickly as potential.

“Sausage kerbs need to go, as ramps,” Wurz added.

“If you happen to’re within the apex on the chicane [it’s okay], however when you’re spinning within the braking zone in no matter course, you should not have something which catapults you all of a sudden into the air. [It’s] in no way acceptable.”

100 per cent security can’t be created, says Wurz

Wurz admits that to create an surroundings with out security dangers can be inconceivable.

“We can’t create an surroundings which is 100 per cent protected,” the Austrain acknowledged.

“It is just like the [aviation] business; you’ll by no means have 100 per cent security as a result of the second you are up there, you could have a consequence if one thing fails. You fall down.

“In racing, we have now the identical, however by frequent sense, we should always simply make the management mechanisms and the security networks higher.

“It is okay [for a kerb to] destabilise a automobile, nevertheless it’s not okay [for it] to vary the trajectory, while you’re already in bother.”

Wurz cited Rubens Barrichello’s enormous crash over the 1994 Imola weekend for example: “This initiated the kerb design adjustments.

“[It was] very fortunate that he survived, [and] very fortunate that there was a security fence already, as a result of again then it was not regular to have security fences. In any other case, [the crash] would have killed all of the folks behind them.”

Whereas the GPDA Chairman is happy with the progress made since then, he feels {that a} key difficulty has not but been resolved.

“On such locations, after all, it is good to remove ramps and kerbs, and kerbs mustn’t catapult you,” Wurz acknowledged.

“However, with the asphalt zones behind, then [it’s] pressured that the kerb turns into the decisive separator, and that may be a little bit of a problem with the thought course of.”

Leave a Comment