Williams and Latifi agreed to half methods on the finish of the 2022 season, because the Canadian has been unable to point out the continued development from final season and is but to bother the scorers.
This brings an finish to Latifi’s time as a Williams race driver after three seasons, because the Grove outfit considers choices to associate Alex Albon on the group for 2023.
Explaining Williams’ determination, the Toronto native stated that the group had concluded to not maintain him after Monza, however that the decision got here after assessing the previous few races – fairly than in response to Nyck de Vries’ starring position as an alternative choice to Albon on the Italian Grand Prix.
“It is easy, actually; it is a results-based business, and clearly the efficiency hasn’t been there this 12 months for a lot of totally different causes,” Latifi stated. “The group needed to decide a call that felt finest for them. And so they needed to transfer in a distinct route. So yeah, very, quite simple.
“I perceive the choice, clearly. And I simply type of have to, nicely, I’ve already accepted it and transfer on with the following part of my profession.
“I am undoubtedly glad with what I did. In a method, it is type of made it simpler for me to just accept the choice, as a result of I do not actually have any regrets about how I went about doing the work – both off the monitor or on the monitor.
“It simply did not work out. So yeah, no regrets from my aspect.”
Nicholas Latifi, Williams FW44
Photograph by: Glenn Dunbar / Motorsport Photos
After making his debut in 2020, Latifi earned a second season with Williams and confirmed progress from his rookie 12 months, getting nearer to then team-mate George Russell on extra events and scoring seven factors. Most notably, he outperformed Russell in his run to seventh on the Hungarian Grand Prix.
However Latifi admits that he was unable to adapt to the FW44, constructed to the change in laws for 2022, and felt that it not often gave him the arrogance to point out his finest.
He stated: “Naturally the philosophy of those vehicles, not essentially our automobile, nevertheless it’s type of added to the problem and driveability. They’re clearly very totally different, they’re extra on edge, much less compliant, much less forgiving – partly as a result of the tyre, partly as a result of the aerodynamics, the stiffness, so on.
“On face worth, they’re simply not as good to drive with them. And our automobile normally, to illustrate, had some basic flaws within the steadiness. So that is one factor I would say when it comes to the general downforce you’ve gotten, which we all know we’re missing downforce.
“Clearly it is a problem as a result of you understand, downforce is…you at all times need extra. And we all know we’re missing loads as a result of after we get to the utmost downforce tracks we’re the least aggressive, or the much less aggressive in comparison with different tracks.
“However yeah, for me, it is simply the type of basic dealing with of the automobile, the steadiness. With final 12 months’s automobile, I did really feel fairly a bit higher. However nonetheless, to be trustworthy, that was by no means was a automobile that suited my driving type, I did have to alter quite a bit and adapt fairly a bit.
“However I simply discover it simpler to cope with final 12 months’s. And that is simply the philosophy of that regulation of automobile was a bit simpler, whereas this 12 months, it simply by no means clicked.”